From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74333 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: updating backend marks immediately Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:46:47 +0100 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87pquku8wi.fsf@uwo.ca> <87wromp358.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874obq2d61.fsf@uwo.ca> <874obppbct.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lj4yksha.fsf@uwo.ca> <87aalbh91g.fsf@uwo.ca> <87eiaegmho.fsf@uwo.ca> <87fwuq4d15.fsf@uwo.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290635256 6974 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2010 21:47:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:47:36 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22698@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Nov 24 22:47:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLNBZ-0000zR-Le for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:47:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PLNBE-0003N8-Ag; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:47:08 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PLNBD-0003My-6W for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:47:07 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PLNB8-00023d-Jj for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:47:07 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PLNB4-0003k3-00 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:46:58 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLNB3-0000gz-E0 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:46:57 +0100 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:46:57 +0100 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:46:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEUuKCcSERK4sqdPRTZu YEkICAhVkpm3AAACSklEQVQ4jW1TW3bjIAyVjRcASfyfyCwABxaAQf0Pk3r/W+kVdWfaaXR8AHMl cfWiwb0ScjTvr2RupOuv2901ajyyfVt48X9m4S6el+0EgLnc9Hd8K3p5YB3ov55vAJYCDyr05Lvu RaFS2J/uJ6+K1Fa7EoGeDcE4s7b2HM5DMNT25tz/bNu+U3M7gPYrHGrwQ8MkXaoxlQ75AUT6BpiA pw9AJH2zqJLny+EqSf68DtTKIjJPMXVXUbKZ/EVioiY+yQqgI7CwI0uJUYEaJUFqNwnm7qdPi6As Y3+gxoRPoKgWOQUyehOhge0ugyirmkCBTJIAEwVStCYCgNVKOCZ1gDXEBB8TtSjKGo+Ag9KlkKQA eGQOA1wRnNQvgFekHYXugKlGGQ02VtQLb2B11pra08U+UiTw1iSa4KDlJ2bhRTyCHk2utEPhUsNa crcQCZEmWSLtZpkkh8qbQaaMcI0kddO0gzsFEXKWBiclm8E6nHc7uEGzHtDeiMcrMNhM+4PsbALy AH0KMVsFkKv9HZrWVnQW0eRTVoXBAnjSMDsrGmRMnGQDgEfgasXpfN7Omi8GcfQG3qX2ADstB2gZ 9tom8egSWxAyV29SLhUhhl5hpCSjDQoqq5XW6D3CjxX1gJuEczbRTOXoO4TfNOUEW9RXt2iitgpR 7/pXA90wtC8n/en9WQfN8u3KfD3xNN62c9EZ5JOO4KmP5FVn8eYxn/TOOp33L0CXW5/a9/7/BSzl L/DwmN1tZFcyT3y98HjdGHNNv6jag9WPUf0Hzx/Dk7imCrwkAgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Joanna Newsom's _Have One On Me (1)_: "Good Intentions Paving Co." User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:X6BLQc5Ga/SjBlGDWuO8xLFjrPo= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:74333 Archived-At: Dan Christensen writes: >> It occurs to me that I should probably have do it the other way around. >> That is, set the marks on the article before moving it, and then not >> bother to copy over the marks afterwards. The result should be much the >> same, but slightly more secure if something fails in the middle. > > I think what you propose might be better. Yeah, I'm attempting to do that now, but it isn't totally trivial. There's apparently no single function to just sync all the (current) flags from a single article to the backend? So I think I'll have to write that first. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen