From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72739 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: 'g' transfers a lot of data Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:41:16 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87vd5glbad.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286480552 14643 80.91.229.12 (7 Oct 2010 19:42:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 19:42:32 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21111@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Oct 07 21:42:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3wMG-0007Ie-7I for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:42:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P3wME-000550-R3; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:42:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P3wMD-00054f-BC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:42:25 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P3wM8-00068y-U7 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:42:25 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P3wM8-0000BF-00 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:42:20 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3wM2-0007CJ-DF for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:42:14 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:42:14 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:42:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAKlBMVEWTb3YVDArj1uj5+f3z 7/rRvtFuPDf9/v7////t5vT+//6miZfAp7qIWlvb856/AAACKElEQVQ4jW3SsY6bQBAA0KnSEBc0 +YCNUUQNke9ag5RsSzRSpNDQbOeKRPhqR8JyiX2KVvmApKRLsbg5iWq3cOWOf8ks5/PZmClsNG+Y 2Vkb1n2syrv1dYD92Gzy9Wx5Az/w6aMxX4dvLNe/walr+HcLHmqD+OUGij/Fw/uiKK9nlLCsWMV8 v5IfBnDHeSwjKfmvK8hpxsYeeDChDGG4WJ/+u7ofhSDPOSzHIIrmY1CGcVyNQR5zyS6hfP5ahXPJ vEtYnV7gtDKOQMgZ88zlcVenTtUQnmesYu4xNLcLfg8lwzEI4oryBj4PIeSPiK2GaJAvQ+khpgp2 g9V/ct92UjAtrl94oNGt0Qr88/T+tOV95aUpWvh0sV9Z5D20CiA5w4zSQcArlhq0sD01KqKA8qEv H7G1gNvTsfIoCsKI+3KOaUqnal+G5NtdWMlq6lct6m8WtjP7LyyDWErGmM8YJrQ4mGQaFcU6zyNK 07WyBGlBtYcG/V0U0O8vK7oKigS91NQATct8uQvorj17FcYklG/qCTgGqTGP7fH7oBvUuj4StEjE vCetKBprWsMRDsoWIepG13ASXU8EdA49tmjqt9ABAIFq6n2XweLg2DLdOUfRHTpQ1LGeLAiozlFG iYMQi07YMgVHkYEtO1CR6DJXkBHUBC4BBai9EK7rkkHtwKGHRddRuzeuBdd9R50nC5ERiM5a5p7C drA1BLazeAWK7Ayv+R7cMXiJ/66uE2jh3QDTAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: The Cure's _Seventeen Seconds (1)_: "A Forest" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:C37l8eM0+B7ri1HIXpxjvVM0AB0= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72739 Archived-At: Julien Danjou writes: > If I understand correctly, that seems a very dangerous behaviour. You > mean that if I put/remove the \Seen flags on a very old mail from > another Gnus instance, the other one will not see it? Yes. > Maybe 100 is not enough actually? > How others MUA plays with that? The only way to get the flags data (without QRESYNC) is to say "UID FETCH FLAGS 1:*". If you have 200K messages in that group, it'll take a while. When all IMAP servers get QRESYNC support this will be a moot issue, but at present you have to trade off accuracy for speed in this area. I think other MUAs do opportunistic FLAGS sync in the background. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen