From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/63133 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: slow PGP in No Gnus v0.4 Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 17:00:43 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <871wvtbzwn.fsf@lapin-bleu.net> <87wtdft96c.fsf@lapin-bleu.net> <87d5f6kjcc.fsf@w3.org> <9eslo2alzk.fsf@gowron.rz-berlin.mpg.de> <871wvl95b6.fsf@lapin-bleu.net> <9emze9trg9.fsf@doze.jochen-kuepper.de> <87odyobp8d.fsf@lapin-bleu.net> <9efyjvgvs7.fsf@doze.jochen-kuepper.de> <87fyjvckwx.fsf@denkblock.local> <873bfvyw2i.fsf@pps.jussieu.fr> <87odyhyio8.fsf@pps.jussieu.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146496244 6003 80.91.229.2 (1 May 2006 15:10:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m11660@lists.math.uh.edu Mon May 01 17:10:43 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Faa2i-0002QQ-U1 for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 17:10:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Faa2e-0002wT-00; Mon, 01 May 2006 10:10:29 -0500 Original-Received: from nas02.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.40]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Faa2R-0002wO-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 01 May 2006 10:10:15 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas02.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Faa2P-0002p5-Cb for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 01 May 2006 10:10:15 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Faa2O-0002WG-00 for ; Mon, 01 May 2006 17:10:12 +0200 Original-Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Faa2E-0002Jc-EM for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 17:10:02 +0200 Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org ([80.91.231.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 May 2006 17:10:02 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by quimbies.gnus.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 May 2006 17:10:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: quimbies.gnus.org Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEVbaZl6jLpshsOasqmm vLGSqJiRr9+0xru0y9fO2NDW4dzU5+7k6N39/fzF2fHCy7xPDUn2AAAACXBIWXMAAABIAAAASABG yWs+AAABXklEQVQ4y3WTsUsDMRTGg4N/jouDgo43CBacnN1cRJe6OAhuHaouXSzmcCwqxUGwWDlc LHKSR8HJeO8hONTJW8TtoCZn7KWSF0LyLr/3vfflIIIGNQAiJEA0E0GZSQoF4RqQIZbZvQzNhyAa uHhyCDZHIL0V4LK9AWLYLtaLND0bq1Re6bGSaSxV3JamBz34yVZtnZgepPfLI62UJLTGwBALaO/X yPBJgtYaUSmQwpZ59GthuapS4WpNjRJQjQMNDnS6DOg3GUCnHLjgQJ8DGVGShMHrJaP4iPEw1OOk Hq0kAUC9+eguVIpu/7WYAM7u38i6DHjhwDlT6n41DLJ6HAa9hSQMWouM3UYSBlmHAdQ6YsD1EgP0 MvevOFcUceDLv+Cnb8tXNDmwk1eab6jAwezmdqXwwM3MFgXBaO64slK3S/kIQeTvo6rHrlOYxy6S 57zST11Qu8hUwA2Xb8If/+jB6DciiiAAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Laub's _Kopflastig_: "Trau" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110005 (No Gnus v0.5) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:zuBpEaUtwdHF1kEekX5+Ia3U1lI= X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:63133 Archived-At: Juliusz Chroboczek writes: > (In case anyone is interested: together with Z. Landau, we're > integrating the Darcs version control system with Gnus. And in case > anyone is still listening -- any pointers to examples of code that > decorates summary buffers?) The Gnus buffers are mainly made colourful by using the various `gnus-*-mode-line' variables. >> But that reminds me -- has anybody done any work on dkim? > > DomainKeys (the nonstandard ancestor of DKIM) is being deployed by > Gmail and Pobox, which is a significant number of users. DKIM is > being worked on, but last time I checked the spec had some rather > serious bugs due to the conflicting goals of securing mail and > permitting mailing list exploders to add random crap in messages. Right. *sigh* >> Or did that go the way of the dodo, too? > > The technically correct term is ``the way of USEFOR''. Heh heh heh. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen