From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38426 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: message-subject-re Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:46:21 -0400 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174290 22325 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:24:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 8871 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 19:46:21 -0000 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (261@129.22.96.25) by gnus.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 19:46:21 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 20186 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2001 19:46:43 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: (Henrik Enberg's message of "Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:40:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 12 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38426 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38426 Henrik Enberg wrote: > Ick, does this mean that we're going to see people posting with Gnus > using Sv: style subject lines and non-standard sig separators? > > I think some stuff _should_ be hardcoded. It's already possible to do those things. Maybe message-make-re-subject-function makes it easier to do bad things, but the defaults encourage good behavior. paul