From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18820 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Congratulations, Larsi Date: 18 Nov 1998 01:54:06 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157281 8311 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:41:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA27148 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 20:10:44 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAB27651; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 19:10:37 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 17 Nov 1998 19:10:25 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA22531 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 19:09:39 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp110.uio.no [129.240.240.115]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA27074 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 20:09:30 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA12541; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 02:14:55 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Elizabeth Hand's _Waking the Moon_ X-Now-Playing: The Clash's _Sandinista!_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Alexandre Oliva's message of "17 Nov 1998 16:15:57 -0200" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070049 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.49) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Although gnus currently provides an option for the user to do that, it > might be nice if it would only do so if a certain variable (custom?) > was set. If such variable is not enabled, gnus would just refuse to > post such messages, possibly indicating a section of the manual in > order to allow such behavior. I don't see any reason to disallow posting, say, empty messages. The user is given a warning that it's probably not a good idea to do so, but there are legitimate reasons to post empty messages. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen