From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12886 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Intelligent handling of interrupted communication Date: 23 Nov 1997 07:19:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152345 6215 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:19:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA05384 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 00:19:46 -0800 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA22451 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 02:19:55 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with SMTP id IAA22818 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 08:10:34 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (qmail 21323 invoked by uid 504); 23 Nov 1997 07:10:33 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 21320 invoked from network); 23 Nov 1997 07:10:31 -0000 Original-Received: from xyplex16.uio.no (HELO sparky.gnus.org) (129.240.154.36) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 23 Nov 1997 07:10:16 -0000 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA16363; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 07:52:08 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "21 Nov 1997 21:42:22 +0100" X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.14/XEmacs 19.15 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Aside from my very specific situation, I can think of a number of > cases where intelligent handling of interrupted communication with the > news server would come in very handy. Since this is Emacs, all it > would take is an intelligent `quit' condition-case catcher. > > Would it be consider useful enough for Gnus? Would it be possible to > implement cleanly, given the current abstraction model? Yes, I think so. We could just catch the `quit' in Message and close the connection if it was found. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen