From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59099 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus slow? Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:41:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87sm7hua65.fsf@orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100150334 4039 80.91.229.6 (11 Nov 2004 05:18:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 05:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7637@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Nov 10 19:43:21 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CRxRB-0007h5-00 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:43:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CRxQ4-0006Ue-00; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:42:12 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CRxPw-0006T6-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:42:04 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CRxPt-0000Yx-BJ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:42:01 -0600 Original-Received: from fitch6.uni2.net (fitch6.uni2.net [130.227.52.126]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B913A01EF for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:41:54 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from defun.localdomain (83.72.206.24.ip.tele2adsl.dk [83.72.206.24]) by fitch6.uni2.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAAIfpKn015187 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:41:52 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Gabor Z. Papp's message of "Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:39:39 +0000 (UTC)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59099 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59099 Gabor Z.Papp writes: > Romain Francoise orebokech.com> writes: > >> In my case it is very slow to fetch new articles even if I disable >> NNTP marks via `nntp-marks-is-evil'. I have reverted to No Gnus >> from May 12th and it is much faster (by several orders of >> magnitude) to fetch articles. > > I have noticed the same slowdown effect with cvs co on 20041109, and > I'm using Gnus only with nnmaildir and imap, not nntp at all. > Scanning through the nnmaildir is much slower than with earlier cvs > snapshots (like 200409xx) Try to play around with `M-x elp-instrument-package gnus'[1], and compare the results from `M-x elp-results' between the different Gnus version. Posts the results if you can reproduce some significant differences. [1] Or maybe 'nnml', 'nntp' etc depending on which operations are slow. -- Jesper Harder