From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49660 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Malcolm Purvis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: spam.el buglets. Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:08:15 +1100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043665693 7101 80.91.224.249 (27 Jan 2003 11:08:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18d77b-0001qP-00 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:08:11 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18d781-0002zd-00; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 05:08:37 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 27 Jan 2003 05:09:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id FAA12736 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 05:09:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 84569 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2003 11:08:20 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 84564 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2003 11:08:19 -0000 Original-Received: from mail025.syd.optusnet.com.au (210.49.20.147) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 27 Jan 2003 11:08:19 -0000 Original-Received: from c18072.rivrw2.nsw.optusnet.com.au (c18072.rivrw2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.28.55.173]) by mail025.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h0RB8FF10825 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:08:16 +1100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "t>8w.Nd-q:ml[PuI`{tr%l5Y~,sBj?fR1G.q`GM6)3RK+ll4EOE_1Goun~_6nt.5q,rU]` Q,Kxq+|~kZdSuw`3)>5+_/EcS2MS={U]o-eU!y?G(&'dd~\jX|faymzH|72n4oPxOu8c0M2FroLHaA g%#ZHX\p3dIud>Y'+?-@!Om%Z(D2.Fp<*bS8W2Q'{*"WmzMrRZj%)1=|J#3:[`vYdisIP7:`as5Qku ,M(VrTIClqxpH4Z7,_$?ugTWyMq=DQjGEP*M4*/S{Ym{,uq')-b@i_ECSi;Gq+Z[I=kdtX User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) XEmacs/21.4 (Native Windows TTY Support, powerpc-unknown-linux) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49660 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49660 Having used spam.el with bogofilter for a while I have the following comments on this generally excellent tool: 1) gnus.texi still refers to the spam mark as 'H' instead of '$'. 2) In ham groups it looks like read messages are still sent to ham filter for processing even if the group is exited with 'Q' (gnus-summary-exit-no-update). Is this the intended behaviour? My expectation is that no such processing should occur. 3) I am having difficulty understanding the advantages of having the choice of both spam and ham exit processors (ie gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter and gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter) for a given group when only one will apply. Wouldn't a more generic symbol (ie gnus-group-exit-processor-bogofilter) be less confusing and the appropriate type of exit processing determined from the group's spam/ham classification? Malcolm -- Malcolm Purvis The hidden, terrible cost of nuclear warfare is Really Bad Public Art. - Angus McIntyre, alt.peeves, 13/3/02.