From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49688 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: I think I might have mistreated spam.el... Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:34:58 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87n0lmdy8s.fsf@eris.void.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043717240 9245 80.91.224.249 (28 Jan 2003 01:27:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 01:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18dKX0-0002Oe-00 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 02:27:18 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18dKXJ-0000Ms-00; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:27:37 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:28:32 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from ns3.beld.net (ns3.beld.net [208.229.215.83]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA14536 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:28:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from heechee.beld.net (dhcp-0-30-bd-1-93-b2.cpe.beld.net [24.233.67.132]) by ns3.beld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF3D3B981 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:27:21 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@hpc.uh.edu X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@hpc.uh.edu In-Reply-To: <87n0lmdy8s.fsf@eris.void.at> (Andreas Fuchs's message of "Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:26:05 +0000 (UTC)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49688 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49688 On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, asf@void.at wrote: > I just found out why I had believed there was no more spam coming to > me. I use spam.el splitting, and I saw many "filing into > nnml+private:spambox" (that's my spambox) messages, but not one mail > appeared there. So now. > After a few days of having an empty spambox, I looked into my > nnml+private active file, and saw this: > > [...] > 412: newsticker > 1: not-a-mailing-list > [...] > K 222: nnml+private:spambox > [...] > 1: spambox > > Ugggh. Which of these variables is responsible for this group name? > Is it `spam-split-group'? If so, which value should it use? Just > "spambox"? Splitting functions will return a short group name, and the backend will convert that to the fully qualified group name. Thus, spam-split-group should be just "spambox" or whatever you like, and that will translate into "nnml+private:spambox" automatically. This is a Gnus convention (nnmail-split-fancy and nnimap-split-fancy), not something spam.el controls AFAIK. > After that is resolved, my only problem is how to get the articles > from nnml+private:nnml+private:spambox into nnml+private:spambox. mv > should do it (plus faking the right .active article cound, plus > rebuilding nov), right? I would enter the group, select all the articles, and move them. Should be very quick with nnml. Ted