From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37149
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Brian Edmonds <brian@gweep.ca>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: bah, i've had it with html
Date: 27 Jul 2001 06:19:41 -0700
Message-ID: <m3puam5x1u.fsf@yuri.aq2.gweep.ca>
References: <m3zo9re29i.fsf@yuri.aq2.gweep.ca>
	<873d7j2r0r.church.of.emacs@space-ghost.verbum.org>
	<m3vgkf54he.fsf@yuri.aq2.gweep.ca>
	<vafpuam7naw.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<ruoy9pa7dpe.fsf@g.wolfram.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172615 12339 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:56:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:56:55 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <brian@gweep.ca>
Return-Path: <brian@gweep.ca>
Original-Received: (qmail 3833 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2001 13:35:26 -0000
Original-Received: from novus.isp.gweep.ca (HELO lios2.aq2.gweep.ca) (64.69.80.178)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2001 13:35:26 -0000
Original-Received: from gweep.ca (lios.aq2.gweep.ca [192.168.1.1])
	by lios2.aq2.gweep.ca (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with ESMTP id 291403188B
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 06:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by gweep.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) with UUCP id GAA22131
	for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 06:35:09 -0700
Original-Received: by yuri.aq2.gweep.ca (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 151A256F1B; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 06:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Bill White's message of "Fri, 27 Jul 2001 07:34:37 -0500"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon)
Original-Lines: 13
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37149
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37149

Bill White <billw@wolfram.com> writes:
> Is there some way to automate [html2txt] for these stupid html-only
> nnml messages?

At my last job where I was usin procmail, I added a rule to pass any
text/html or multipart/alternative messages through demime before
filing.  Simple, and worked great.

But really, all I seem to get in HTML-only is spam, and I'd rather not
bother.  I just don't want w3 loading up for something I didn't really
want to read anyways.

Brian.