From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78610 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: New messages marked O before seeing them Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 16:56:41 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87ei69praf.fsf@myles.home.wjsullivan.net> <87vczkcld3.fsf@myles.home.wjsullivan.net> <871v27zoqh.fsf@myles.home.wjsullivan.net> <8739l6q7x4.fsf@myles.home.wjsullivan.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304262023 29585 80.91.229.12 (1 May 2011 15:00:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 15:00:23 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M26912@lists.math.uh.edu Sun May 01 17:00:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QGY8A-0001W5-JF for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 17:00:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QGY81-0000mp-2K; Sun, 01 May 2011 10:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QGY80-0000mf-4U for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 01 May 2011 10:00:08 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QGY7z-00070S-7a for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 01 May 2011 10:00:08 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QGY7x-0007z7-Gu for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 17:00:05 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QGY7x-0001P1-Cc for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 17:00:05 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 May 2011 17:00:05 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 May 2011 17:00:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEVcZIg4Mjnb3PL07vqI kbE9PlB3f6A4JAy0u9iYoMPQ0+wZCwOnrs1FTWzl4vXDyOTdsvCXAAACSElEQVQ4jWWSoYsbURDG R9VFBHpEHDVPhpKK9VFLqKhooCsqDiKOQEVFxPEo+QdWLMSsWTg4WFWeiYxYW5GFhTsTVdbs+SdK xRLzOt+8l16aDsR8v/fNNzMbKm0URdMoslap0hjjnEuzpqnJTKy1Hf8YqLEHKcDRKGVVJzqDLfSs bgpyplS2e/fhbZ03v/OH2/c9G+p7DyZqvN/26fH7/rHZCyiCQ/oojpZOF8BlLD26XmYqcnKcLiN9 qeP49oEbZTDEwdH5Ts4hoSmKPKbNsZzwdl2nQkIGEDMwvDt2PAEkxPGMXMlgiov47YJhRkc1eY5w qjEcfRr0JUCEM1q5kxhy1pf0y4PIdtLpZFhSaa04pgA9dhDDgpQHEQOZFYYlG2gSHGiVngwLAohC xrb3yQG8dNr2cj10ohdglXEMOMAnMAjTjp3L5H0wkPIhDHo5kjcMWgA5CX9ajMorcPSgbQlf49lO O5416GxoAcb47/CwaeNv4Q0tGVMafD5ewgd4Q4tvLsXR4b0YGKDkrj9mfgPRE0rTTb+R/0Yuz32j m4T2KWrPM80W0J+gH5KEmlB1PqPQJ0FRc4/T4aryfiDPAapvBYqP5OcPOoPP+GY4tqSegdcxikcd nOsJ/fwU+40XF+D6zeHqSS5xrg/nVFVa69WrBZ2D+XVF0Lk+BoDXybCqKtI7T+4GLALMh6NKwLrS a63Xuzt+fMOd5uvKA8gaRCctg5HXAUKt9erQHkb6AkjS6uv8PyB1xcFB/wcMpRjtzsFoNfxbmsEf UOhcxCnJY8sAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Mia Clarke & Ando Moor's _Guitargument_: "Guitargument Part 1" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Gix+DrpvNeIZDqWr///KeoXDiio= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78610 Archived-At: John Sullivan writes: > I have a sneaking suspicion that I may have solved this by setting > (setq gnus-gcc-mark-as-read nil). It was t before, and my mails are > GCC'd to the inbox. Oh, that makes sense, I think. I mean, it makes sense that that is something that could trigger a bug like this. :-) So how do you reproduce this bug? If you have the inbox summary buffer open, and you post a message (with `gnus-gcc-mark-as-read' set to t), will other messages get marked as read? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/