Re: Process mark and follow up/reply

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> LMI> Actually, this was implemented in 2001 with the `S v' command and
> LMI> friends ("very wide reply").
>
> If I mark multiple articles, chances are I want the very wide reply.
> The user shouldn't carry the burden of figuring this out or remembering
> a different command in a slightly different context.

We could just delete the `S W' (i. e. `F') code and point `S w' at the
`S V' code.  But it'd be a quite user-visible change.

On the other hand, like we said before, I can't really imagine somebody
not wanting the `S v' action.  It'd be like "I have this range of
articles that I want to respond to, but I want the responses only to go
to the senders/recipients of this first message".  I mean, it's possible
that somebody would want that, but then they could just delete the extra
Cc addresses manually.

I vote for removing the `F' code, pointing `F' at the `S V' code and
then undefining `S V'.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen