From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70217 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Process mark and follow up/reply Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:47:00 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87fwy3sy5f.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87y6bop6hk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878w3m39sw.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283280466 30168 80.91.229.12 (31 Aug 2010 18:47:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:47:46 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18603@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Aug 31 20:47:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqVrx-000855-BI for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:47:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OqVrr-0002DV-Ud; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:47:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OqVrq-0002DD-Gh for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:47:34 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OqVrm-0002Sb-8g for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:47:34 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OqVrl-0001pB-00 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:47:29 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqVrl-0007yF-Di for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:47:29 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:47:29 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:47:29 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAKlBMVEVgVk07MSyRh31CODLb 084BAQFMQjrAtq8FBATz7+owKCR4bmQRDg6mnJP/fynmAAACZ0lEQVQ4jV3Uv2vbQBQH8NcarhAv UQUZPLlHSGhNwOZAQ7qEIhAZMgo0dFAQaAmFUgImTTWqiOKpGIIHQ0MghMOD7SGFikwlxhgNaQg1 bar/pe/dJf6hL0jg7+fu+WwZQwfTPnJO3l/EifcZgPMtqjqg4NBx7q/dJBkRbC6A3XVurr3Y+1mA E6frfIwR1I71Ary7hN63ArTtr/Zh5xjuoiI4u3ivbh4fVsvLo47au52Tqz14trMM3fb01n6Tgg83 CC8X4QrW74GF0IclcGxgm2UWhuwS0lRBm8D+4LCwj33IGMIfdU6C3dpeqMOYn6Z3NkXtGO7o3g+W oG3z30FgCWGBxQ6WdnBmEYi+Fc6BbrWSJQg2xAwcBcNSIEQgzIFVgKfWfkME++YgCP0yEDSbCsqW YRgiWH2CBwO4a1IIHFZCMOvPTUEw1YBX5A8QjHrZFGIOUZ7fHuwTrG0sQAQ5ZliRhpRng8YiNHPO q5JyykoziHIaxX8pkHWcqAGn4IPh/IeG1YYGmp5DHkUvVD3JJngC/CS5Bp5HF+5DvszhFuH4sXff LkJt+mkG7ukMOFSn/2a915Aa8EDApn+vH2FyTrBFB+VgfH/Ve+hb8nwbgWtg/ko21m89kecrItBQ A/xxbEs5Ttw4UyDqc1ARhlGRctt8gJQg0ITP3cAveVX1CELQeh16LBV/mKap2kFrKWbDJJFrM1At XqdUY87KCPi6YuAQIRpqEEFvpABPgp2pFmdZNm6Nk9brPhjGGa7vYZMsZNQH2cNl42Q5rQlA7HlJ Ehf6casOLv63uMUNSTYC14uLG5JWlk3+Az1+2TUin1AlAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: On's _Something That Has Form And Something That Does Not_: "Blank Space" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ONcIA2f/v+7u8SiAMC5H3SZUObo= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70217 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > LMI> Actually, this was implemented in 2001 with the `S v' command and > LMI> friends ("very wide reply"). > > If I mark multiple articles, chances are I want the very wide reply. > The user shouldn't carry the burden of figuring this out or remembering > a different command in a slightly different context. We could just delete the `S W' (i. e. `F') code and point `S w' at the `S V' code. But it'd be a quite user-visible change. On the other hand, like we said before, I can't really imagine somebody not wanting the `S v' action. It'd be like "I have this range of articles that I want to respond to, but I want the responses only to go to the senders/recipients of this first message". I mean, it's possible that somebody would want that, but then they could just delete the extra Cc addresses manually. I vote for removing the `F' code, pointing `F' at the `S V' code and then undefining `S V'. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen