Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org>
Cc: "Satyaki Das" <satyakid@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: PGG default values
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:12:00 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r80gi7gf.fsf@ieee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ilufzgxnqxg.fsf_-_@latte.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's message of "Sun, 09 Nov 2003 23:00:11 +0100")

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> I think the first one should default to t.  Sending encrypted messages
> and later discovering you can't read them yourself would be a bad
> experience.  People that understands enough to worry about a default
> setting of t will certainly be able to search for the variable in the
> manual and disable it.  Opinions?

I'd rather stick with that option in the ~/.gnupg/options file
only. There you can say if you want the message / document / whatever
to be encrypted for you or not. This is a better solution since it is
global for all programs that use GPG. 

> For the second one, I think 16 seconds is a rather pointless cache
> (maybe only to fix the extra invocation of gpg for GCC).  But I
> don't know what a good default would be.  An hour?  A workday?
> Opinions?  As you can infer from my settings, I lean towards
> infinity, but perhaps a more conservative setting should be used.

I use 5 minutes. Usually I'm sending more than one encrypted message,
but I don't want the passphrase to be cached for too long. I used to
use one minute, but it bored me. 

> I suspect a good feature request at this point would be to add a
> yes-or-no-p on whether to use a cached passphrase, but until someone
> else mention I'll pretend I haven't thought about it. :-) If such a
> query is added, having an infinite passphrase cache might make
> sense.

I don't think so. This somewhat violates the idea of knowing the
passphrase to use the encryption. From 3 to 5 minutes is what I think
ideal for a cache (and I think that this is a lot of time...). 


See you,
-- 
Godoy.     <godoy@ieee.org>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-11-10 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-08 21:43 PGG with multiple GnuPG keys Satyaki Das
2003-11-09  4:04 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-11-09 20:16   ` Satyaki Das
2003-11-09 21:45     ` Simon Josefsson
2003-11-09 22:00       ` PGG default values (was: Re: PGG with multiple GnuPG keys) Simon Josefsson
2003-11-09 22:22         ` PGG default values Jesper Harder
2003-11-10  2:31         ` PGG default values (was: Re: PGG with multiple GnuPG keys) Satyaki Das
2003-11-10  3:13           ` PGG default values Simon Josefsson
2003-11-10 15:12         ` Jorge Godoy [this message]
2003-11-10 16:19           ` Simon Josefsson
2003-11-10 20:53             ` Jorge Godoy
2003-11-10  2:20       ` PGG with multiple GnuPG keys Satyaki Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3r80gi7gf.fsf@ieee.org \
    --to=godoy@ieee.org \
    --cc=satyakid@stanford.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).