From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37012 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Check for existing groups when sending: what should happen? Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 00:03:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172503 11634 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:55:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 24096 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2001 04:03:05 -0000 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (261@129.22.96.25) by gnus.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2001 04:03:05 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 11827 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2001 04:03:26 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Sun, 22 Jul 2001 00:48:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 10 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37012 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37012 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes: > It's not clear to me which behavior is better, though: normally, it > does not make sense to post to unsubscribed groups. But it might > happen via crossposting. It could check that all groups exist and that at least one is subscribed. Or make it configurable, maybe? paul