Re: multipart uuencoded articles are not all marked read

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>]

Karl Kleinpaste <karl@justresearch.com> writes:

> If one has a summary showing e.g...
> 
>    [ 500: some guy            ] some-large-file.ext (1/5)
>    [ 500: some guy            ] some-large-file.ext (2/5)
>    [ 500: some guy            ] some-large-file.ext (3/5)
>    [ 500: some guy            ] some-large-file.ext (4/5)
>    [ 397: some guy            ] some-large-file.ext (5/5)
> 
> ...and one extracts some-large-file.ext using `X u', the five
> component articles are correctly obtained and some-large-file.ext is
> reconstructed and left available for viewing as a pseudoarticle.
> However, only the (5/5) article is marked read when this is done.  The
> other four (x/5) articles are still marked unread.
> 
> I have no idea when this broke, as I don't use things like `X u' very
> often.  I used it today for probably the first time in 6 months.

I don't even have access to any binary groups any more.  What would be 
a commonly-carried group that still features uuencoded multipart
messages?  (I.e., not alt.binaries.pictures.furniture.)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen