From: Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com>
Subject: Re: Summary scoring commands/a puzzle
Date: 12 Mar 1998 09:52:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3ra47yex0.fsf@org.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uvhtja8v3.fsf@teles.de>
Nils Goesche <ngo@wossolit.teles.de> writes:
> Hi!
>
> Indeed, the documentation for scoring in summary buffer could be clearer. I
> found it disencouraging because I didn't even see why I would want to score
> an article anyway. Of course, there are subjects and authors that interest
> me more than others, but exactly what would scoring an article help? I have
> read some article and likely won't read it again :) I would be glad if
> someone would be so kind and explain to me, why I would want to score
> articles after all, so I can start again reading the documentation :)
People have different uses for Usenet. I am new to all this so want to
soak up as much info as possible.
Certain authors in the Emacs groups have posted lots of really useful
info. I go back to those postings repeatedly.
Here is one example of how to use scoring:
I have set several authors to be scored up, now when the nntp posting
arrive those authors are scored at 1000. I read thru the new postings.
Whatever looks interesting. When done I run the limited view command
like so:
'C-u 1000 / v' This will show a view of only those messages scored at
1000. Now I will 'tick' them all so they stay on my HDD. When I get
lost using emacs or gnus I can call up all those ticked articles and
search them for answers.
Heres another example: Lets say I want to know more about a dired
function than I am finding in the manual -- in this case dired-do-search
and replace
Go to comp.emacs Do 'C-u <enter>' this calls up all articles from server
plus what ever I have ticked maybe 6-7 hundred in all.
Using the scoring commands -- (score on body) I can send gnus through
all 6-7 hundred messages looking for a regular expression of my choosing.
Something like dired-do-.*search.*replace.*$ <== this tells gnus to
find every instance in all articles where someone has mentioned
"dired-do" "search" "replace" but only if they are all on the same line,
and give it a score I determined.
NOTE: There are probably more elegant expressions but as mentioned I am
just learning to use them.
Once this is done, I can limit the view to that score and study the
postings that contain the information I want.
A combination of scoring and limiting the view is a technique with many uses.
--
Harry Putnam reader@newsguy.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-03-12 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-03-11 13:32 Harry Putnam
1998-03-12 21:37 ` Nils Goesche
1998-03-12 17:52 ` Harry Putnam [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3ra47yex0.fsf@org.com \
--to=reader@newsguy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).