From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69468 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Cloos Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: hashcash removal from Gnus? does anyone use it? Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:09:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87k4t3xehn.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269367926 9377 80.91.229.12 (23 Mar 2010 18:12:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: ding-owner+M17863@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Mar 23 19:12:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu8a6-0004ER-2N for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:11:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu8a2-0000Id-46; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:11:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu8a0-0000IL-Vu for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:11:52 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu8Zz-0007G5-A1 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:11:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eagle.jhcloos.com ([207.210.242.212]) by quimby with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Nu9W3-0005bL-00 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:11:51 +0100 Original-Received: by eagle.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 8C62D401E0; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:11:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=eagle; t=1269367902; bh=vSEdQMZYJ0yKQWsndqiNmeOhym0voowjx/Ias3CpedM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZpNfBRFHg/5cfJYqM63DGwp4wjnJIiFfOhnnOCJkWgHtehj4Kf0zdCGPiKoNXYwzr Q4ZQLs8DGZvoRjruejoGHfQMDOc/a003jD4U4n4jprSiTAkQmNmXpoF4DxUhtfnbvy wXs69Mv7elJqIW/Y+GqZhRCiSqCkeDTCJJJVhsYA= Original-Received: by lugabout.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 04F67A00E0; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:10:17 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87k4t3xehn.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:08:20 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQCAYAAAAf8/9hAAAABHNCSVQICAgIfAhkiAAAAI1J REFUOE+lU9ESgCAIg64P1y+ngUdxhl5H8wFbbM0OmUiEhKkCYaZThXCo6KE5sCbA1DDX3genvO4d eBQgEMaM5qy6uWk4SfBYfdu9jvBN9nSVDOKRtwb+I3epboOsOX5pZbJNsBJFvmQQ05YMfieIBnYX FK2N6dOawd97r/e8RjkTLzmMsiVgrAoEugtviCM3v2WzjgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Copyright: Copyright 2009 James Cloos OpenPGP: ED7DAEA6; url=http://jhcloos.com/public_key/0xED7DAEA6.asc OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6 Original-Lines: 15 X-Hashcash: 1:30:100323:tzz@lifelogs.com::Xpf0ghf28IR73LJj:4F+74 X-Hashcash: 1:30:100323:ding@gnus.org::6xbTKTECazTO57so:000IgJ8N X-Hashcash: 1:30:100323:emacs-devel@gnu.org::LclweK0hd+TmNjO6:000000000000000000000000000000000000000008GLRh X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69468 gmane.emacs.devel:122571 Archived-At: >>>>> "TZ" == Ted Zlatanov writes: TZ> Does anyone actually use hashcash (on the receiver or sender side)? I send it -- this message should have one -- but since my current laptop is so much slower cpu-wise than my outgoing smtp box, I currently generate the headers there. I'd expect to switch back to running it on the laptop, though, once I have a newer one. I'd vote for keeping support in both gnus and Emacs in general; just make it an autoload rather than a require. -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6