From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/63091 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: slow PGP in No Gnus v0.4 Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:38:53 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <871wvtbzwn.fsf@lapin-bleu.net> <87wtdft96c.fsf@lapin-bleu.net> <87d5f6kjcc.fsf@w3.org> <9eslo2alzk.fsf@gowron.rz-berlin.mpg.de> <871wvl95b6.fsf@lapin-bleu.net> <9emze9trg9.fsf@doze.jochen-kuepper.de> <87odyobp8d.fsf@lapin-bleu.net> <9efyjvgvs7.fsf@doze.jochen-kuepper.de> <87fyjvckwx.fsf@denkblock.local> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146400901 19124 80.91.229.2 (30 Apr 2006 12:41:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m11618@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Apr 30 14:41:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaBF4-0005LG-To for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:41:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FaBF0-0007p8-00; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:41:34 -0500 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FaBD0-0007p2-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:39:30 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FaBCy-0004Lw-UW for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:39:30 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FaBCx-0007p8-00 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:39:27 +0200 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FaBCu-00053d-Mx for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:39:24 +0200 Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org ([80.91.231.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:39:24 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by quimbies.gnus.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:39:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: quimbies.gnus.org Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: David Bowie's _Diamond Dogs_ User-Agent: Gnus/5.110005 (No Gnus v0.5) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZDLRM2jL1dI4X065Ikaf0rLSogs= X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:63091 Archived-At: Elias Oltmanns writes: > I disagree on that one, I'm afraid. There are three states of a > message which the user should be able to tell apart easily: > 1. Message has been signed and verification failed (obvious); > 2. message has been signed and verification succeeded (as opposed to) > 3. message hasn't been signed in the first place. In my opinion, the difference between 2 and 3 is only interesting if you're trying to determine the validity of the mail message seriously. When you're reading mail normally, it's about as interesting as whether the message is encoded in quoted-printable or base64. That is, not very. Of course, you're free to disagree. :-) Which is why we have `gnus-buttonized-mime-types'. Which I still think should always default to nil. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen