From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54688 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: scoring vs. killing Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:18:20 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1068052876 12576 80.91.224.253 (5 Nov 2003 17:21:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3229@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Nov 05 18:21:14 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AHRLG-0006PD-00 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:21:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AHRL6-0006gS-00; Wed, 05 Nov 2003 11:21:04 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AHRL2-0006gN-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 05 Nov 2003 11:21:00 -0600 Original-Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [193.162.153.3]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1593A0067 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:21:00 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from [195.215.224.202] (0xc3d7e0ca.esnxr4.ras.tele.dk [195.215.224.202]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AC45EE1B6 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 18:20:58 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (David Abrahams's message of "Wed, 05 Nov 2003 06:45:39 -1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54688 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54688 David Abrahams writes: > I can't find a good definition for "expunge", but if it means what I > think it does in my nnimap groups, I don't want it. Hmm, I guess the meaning of "expunge" in nnimap is inconsistent with the meaning elsewhere in Gnus. I don't use IMAP, but as far as I can tell the two different uses don't mean the same at all. > The idea is simply to *hide* the messages, not to remove them from > the server. Is there a way to achieve that? Yup, that's what `gnus-summary-expunge-below' does.