From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36411 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sender header? Date: 25 May 2001 11:31:24 -0400 Sender: prj@multivac.cwru.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172000 8438 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:46:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 16163 invoked by alias); 25 May 2001 15:31:24 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 16158 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 15:31:24 -0000 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (261@129.22.96.25) by gnus.org with SMTP; 25 May 2001 15:31:24 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 28712 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2001 15:31:46 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Karl Kleinpaste's message of "25 May 2001 07:50:43 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 10 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36411 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36411 Karl Kleinpaste writes: > We have argued over the semantics of Sender for years, and evidently > even now have never gotten it quite right (else the argument > wouldn't have resumed now), Gnus's current behavior is correct for news. But for mail, Sender is a completely different entity which just happens to have the same name. paul