From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53754 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "James H. Cloos Jr." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus: UTF-8 and compatibility with other MUAs Date: 17 Aug 2003 22:09:50 -0400 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1061172718 3043 80.91.224.253 (18 Aug 2003 02:11:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 02:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M2295@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Aug 18 04:11:56 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19oZUy-0001p8-00 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 04:11:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19oZT9-0000et-00; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 21:10:03 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19oZT5-0000em-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 21:09:59 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 37088 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2003 02:09:59 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 37083 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2003 02:09:59 -0000 Original-Received: from ore.jhcloos.com (64.240.156.239) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2003 02:09:59 -0000 Original-Received: from lugabout.jhcloos.org (ppp39.pm3-7.buf-ch.ny.localnet.com [207.251.196.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "lugabout.jhcloos.org", Issuer "ca.jhcloos.com" (verified OK)) by ore.jhcloos.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6190F1C59C for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 21:09:57 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from lugabout.jhcloos.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugabout.jhcloos.org (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.3 (i386)) with ESMTP id 967A725AA2 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 02:09:50 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53754 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53754 >>>>> "Simon" == Simon Josefsson writes: Simon> Wasn't the Klingon proposal for Unicode rejected? Tengwar has Simon> been a proposal for ten years, or so, and nothing has happend, Simon> as far as I know. Klingon was rejected because it is a made-up script/language. Tengwar is unlikely to be accepted for the same reason. That said, Tengwar has been singled out by some as a great script to use as the basis for a document describing how to properly support complex scripts. (It is probably about as complex to render as arabic, urdu, etc. At least based on recent comments on the unicode list.) -JimC