From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/48423 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Possible bug in nnml code Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 19:31:28 +0100 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <84bs3zb787.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1041304813 22009 80.91.224.249 (31 Dec 2002 03:20:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 03:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18TCwp-0005iS-00 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 04:20:07 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18TCwa-00038c-00; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 21:19:52 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 30 Dec 2002 21:20:43 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA15655 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 21:20:18 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 64808 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2002 03:19:20 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 64803 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2002 03:19:20 -0000 Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (80.91.231.2) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 31 Dec 2002 03:19:20 -0000 Original-Received: from larsi by quimbies.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18TCw4-00036E-00 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 04:19:20 +0100 X-From-Line: nobody Sat Dec 28 19:31:28 2002 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Seely's _Parentha See_: "Sealskin" Original-To: ding@gnus.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: |J writes: > The general idea is to: > > 1. Rewrite the nnmail-cache-* functions somewhat: > > -- they should be able to operate on multiple groups per article (to > support crossposts), > > -- one should be able to implement nnmail-cache differently (in my > case, I am working on an SQL-based implementation and it seems to > work pretty well so far). Sounds like a good idea, except for the SQL part. :-) That'll limit the usefulness for other users quite heavily. And, yes, the name "cache" is quite confusing. Perhaps something like "registry" or the like would be clearer. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen