From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/45961
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: TMDA (was: new spam functionality added)
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 18:23:29 -0400
Organization: What did you have in mind?  A short, blunt, human pyramid?
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m3u1merzew.fsf_-_@multivac.cwru.edu>
References: <m3lm7rya31.fsf@onyx.nimbus.northernlight.com>
	<oydy9br1xnb.fsf@sam.cs.rice.edu>
	<ilu3ctz8xja.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<87y9brejam.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net>
	<oydu1mf4oxi.fsf@sam.cs.rice.edu>
	<873ctztyth.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net>
	<oyd8z3r4nec.fsf@sam.cs.rice.edu>
	<87bs8nsh7g.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net>
	<oydwurbikzc.fsf@sam.cs.rice.edu>
	<87fzxziifw.fsf@wesley.springies.com> <ueldibcug.fsf@synopsys.com>
	<87ptx2wezj.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net>
	<oydfzxydyjj.fsf@sam.cs.rice.edu> <m3znw6rzur.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<861y9ip6jm.fsf@duchess.twilley.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028240632 12749 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2002 22:23:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 22:23:52 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17aOMJ-0003JW-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Fri, 02 Aug 2002 00:23:51 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 17aOMH-0000C8-00; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:23:49 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:24:16 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA13214
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:24:03 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 24838 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2002 22:23:30 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 24833 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 22:23:30 -0000
Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (@129.22.96.25)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 22:23:30 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 30774 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2002 22:23:52 -0000
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <861y9ip6jm.fsf@duchess.twilley.org> (Jack Twilley's message of
 "Thu, 01 Aug 2002 15:18:05 -0700")
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Lines: 10
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45961
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45961

Jack Twilley <jmt+usenet@twilley.org> wrote:
> Josh Huber
>             net: huber+dated+1028662344.a3e4f6@alum.wpi.edu, huber+dated+1028589381.274799@alum.wpi.edu,[...]

So one technology will adapt to a new one.  There's no reason address
books *can't* deal with dated addresses; they just happen not to at
the moment.  "We were here first" is not an effective argument.


paul