From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/25336
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: why article refresh in gnus-summary-edit-article?
Date: 25 Sep 1999 12:12:09 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m3u2oj2tc6.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
References: <m3lna6fgqv.fsf@gw.rupa.com> <m3r9jo2sk0.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <m3puz8glq6.fsf@gw.rupa.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162739 13464 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:12:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:12:19 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA11667
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 06:25:13 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAB20917;
	Sat, 25 Sep 1999 05:24:33 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 25 Sep 1999 05:24:50 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA16483
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 05:24:11 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (sparky.gnus.org [193.69.4.146])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA11628
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 06:22:09 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost)
	by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA31043;
	Sat, 25 Sep 1999 12:24:56 +0200
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Now-Playing: Karlheinz Stockhausen's _Kontakt_: "Teil 1"
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: "Rupa Schomaker's message of "24 Sep 1999 12:20:33 -0700"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070097 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97) XEmacs/21.2 (Sumida)
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Original-Lines: 17
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25336
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25336

"Rupa Schomaker (list)" <rupa-list@rupa.com> writes:

> The last thing I really want to happen is for the decrypted message
> to actually be saved to the message store (currently I think this
> does happen for backends that support editing).  Would it be
> reasonable to add an optional argument to -edit that tells it not to
> do a reload of the article.  Then something that wants to do the
> -edit and *knows* that it shouldn't do an article reload could
> communicate that fact to -edit...

I don't know whether that would be generally useful.  I think it might 
be better for you to alter the functions to do what you want them to
do... 

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen