* `n' and `p' in Group buffer
@ 1997-11-27 18:27 Stefan Waldherr
1997-11-27 18:53 ` Hrvoje Niksic
1997-11-27 19:07 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Waldherr @ 1997-11-27 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Stefan Waldherr
Hi,
would it be a good idea to let `n' and `p' cycle? Suppose this:
1: group1
0: group2
0: group3
0: group4
Your cursor is on `group4', your finger on the `n' because you used `n' to hop
thru groups 2 and 3. Now, there is no next group with new mail in it, but
there is a previous group with new mail. Of course, you don't want to press
`p' -- cycle to the rescue! Good or evil?
cu
Stefan.
--
Stefan Waldherr office +1 (412) 268-3837
fax +1 (412) 268-5576
e-Mail swa@cs.cmu.edu
www http://www.waldherr.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: `n' and `p' in Group buffer
1997-11-27 18:27 `n' and `p' in Group buffer Stefan Waldherr
@ 1997-11-27 18:53 ` Hrvoje Niksic
1997-11-27 19:07 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hrvoje Niksic @ 1997-11-27 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
Stefan Waldherr <swa@cs.cmu.edu> writes:
> Your cursor is on `group4', your finger on the `n' because you used
> `n' to hop thru groups 2 and 3. Now, there is no next group with new
> mail in it, but there is a previous group with new mail. Of course,
> you don't want to press `p' -- cycle to the rescue! Good or evil?
Sounds like not really necessary. I find the `.' command very useful
in this case.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Oh lord won't you buy me a color TV...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: `n' and `p' in Group buffer
1997-11-27 18:27 `n' and `p' in Group buffer Stefan Waldherr
1997-11-27 18:53 ` Hrvoje Niksic
@ 1997-11-27 19:07 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 1997-11-27 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
Stefan Waldherr <swa@cs.cmu.edu> writes:
> Your cursor is on `group4', your finger on the `n' because you used
> `n' to hop thru groups 2 and 3. Now, there is no next group with new
> mail in it, but there is a previous group with new mail. Of course,
> you don't want to press `p' -- cycle to the rescue! Good or evil?
Eeeeevil! Get thee behind me, Satan!
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1997-11-27 19:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1997-11-27 18:27 `n' and `p' in Group buffer Stefan Waldherr
1997-11-27 18:53 ` Hrvoje Niksic
1997-11-27 19:07 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).