From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55405 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Cache passwords Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:37:30 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87vfoa5she.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1072831278 1579 80.91.224.253 (31 Dec 2003 00:41:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 00:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3945@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Dec 31 01:41:14 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AbUQE-0000jV-00 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:41:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AbUQ0-0001Tg-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:41:00 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AbUPt-0001Ta-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:40:53 -0600 Original-Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4EA3A0038 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:40:52 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from [195.215.224.134] (0xc3d7e086.esnxr4.ras.tele.dk [195.215.224.134]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41785EE190 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:40:50 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:14:39 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1004 (Gnus v5.10.4) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55405 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55405 Simon Josefsson writes: >> But I thought we were dropping support for Emacs 20 in No Gnus. > > I see Well, I don't really remember if any decision has been made. > (why?). Supporting different (broken) versions of MULE is already pretty annoying, IMHO, and it makes the code harder to understand. I think it will become increasingly annnoying to support 20.7 (with lots of conditional code) when Emacs 22 finally switches to Unicode. In general, I think it would be nice to remove some of the compatibility cruft while we can still remember the reason why it was there.