From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46095
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: TMDA (was: new spam functionality added)
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:04:44 -0400
Organization: What did you have in mind?  A short, blunt, human pyramid?
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m3vg6gnjv1.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
References: <m3lm7rya31.fsf@onyx.nimbus.northernlight.com>
	<oydu1mf4oxi.fsf@sam.cs.rice.edu>
	<873ctztyth.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net>
	<oyd8z3r4nec.fsf@sam.cs.rice.edu>
	<hhlm7qf22b.fsf@nightshade.la.mastaler.com>
	<yly9bqexie.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
	<20020801222925.A10502@mastaler.com>
	<ylbs8lg9ou.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
	<m3vg6tqlo9.fsf_-_@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<rjit2pkxz4.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk> <m3sn1tp54j.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<02Aug5.143835edt.119445@gateway.intersystems.com>
	<uit2puj8m.fsf@synopsys.com>
	<02Aug5.174118edt.119294@gateway.intersystems.com>
	<m2fzxsoecr.fsf@m198-149.dsl.rawbw.com>
	<m3ado0nffi.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> <874re5wvrc.fsf@home.lan>
	<877kj11ctx.fsf@naz.lickey.com> <87u1m5w14y.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no>
	<87bs8bygij.fsf@naz.lickey.com> <87ofc9rdcv.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029168345 26252 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2002 16:05:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:05:45 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17eHhQ-0006pJ-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:05:44 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 17eHfr-0004AV-00; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:04:07 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:04:35 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA06494
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:04:17 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 26253 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2002 16:03:44 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 26248 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2002 16:03:44 -0000
Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (@129.22.96.25)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 16:03:44 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 1606 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2002 16:05:08 -0000
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <87ofc9rdcv.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> (Steinar Bang's message of
 "Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:47:28 +0200")
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46095
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46095

Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> wrote:
> And since the From field is what I would like to validate, because
> that's the email address I plan to use to respond, that's the one I
> would like TMDA to verify for me.

Think of it as validating a person, not an address.  As long as the
person is validated, why do you care which address is used for the
validation?


paul