From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/20195 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [pgnus v0.66] Recursive MIME problem Date: 11 Jan 1999 02:03:25 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035158531 16471 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:02:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA08760 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 20:41:10 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAB05332; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 19:40:51 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 10 Jan 1999 19:40:53 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA20367 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 19:40:20 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (larsi@ppp034.uio.no [129.240.240.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA08689 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 20:40:07 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA06441; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 02:39:42 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Paul Auster's _Translations_ X-Now-Playing: Tuxedomoon's _Ten Years in One Night (live)_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Jack Twilley's message of "Mon, 04 Jan 1999 00:04:03 GMT" User-Agent: Gnus/5.07007 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.70) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > This kinda sucks. Either message/rfc822's should be expanded into > article buffers (or inlined), or mm buffers should allow these > commands. Er. Yes. The problem is that the Gnus article buffers really are, er, nothing. They need a summary buffer to function. So perhaps a summary buffer should be created as well... or perhaps Gnus should make it possible for proper article buffers to exists without summary buffers. Hm. I think the latter would be nicest, but I don't know how much work that would be, really... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen