From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/13438 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Russ Allbery Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: kill-to-signature (was GNKSA and Gnus) Date: 04 Jan 1998 20:44:14 -0800 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152805 9305 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:26:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA10546 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 1998 20:59:39 -0800 Original-Received: from farabi.hpc.uh.edu (farabi.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA29451 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 1998 23:00:04 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@[10.1.1.1]) by farabi.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAN16925; Fri, 2 Jan 1998 06:52:33 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 04 Jan 1998 22:44:41 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA06951 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 1998 22:44:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 31616 invoked by uid 504); 5 Jan 1998 04:44:23 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 31613 invoked from network); 5 Jan 1998 04:44:22 -0000 Original-Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (36.21.0.44) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 5 Jan 1998 04:44:22 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 25013 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 1998 04:44:14 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 05 Jan 1998 05:11:09 +0100 Original-Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:13438 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:13438 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Seems like a useful command to me. What keystroke should it be bound > to? The `C-c C-LETTER' keymap is starting to get rather full... Well, the original choice of C-c z (in the space dedicated to user bindings, of course) was for the mnemonic similarity to ESC z. In my version of Gnus, C-c C-z still hasn't been taken, but I'm still using a fairly old version. -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)