From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/56531 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: RFC-2231 vs. RFC-2047 Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:20:55 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1078356381 31511 80.91.224.253 (3 Mar 2004 23:26:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:26:21 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5072@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Mar 04 00:26:12 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ayfki-0006TW-00 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:26:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Ayfk1-0002Qr-00; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 17:25:29 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Ayfju-0002Ql-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 17:25:22 -0600 Original-Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677BE3A0054 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:25:20 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from [195.215.224.162] (0xc3d7e0a2.esnxr4.ras.tele.dk [195.215.224.162]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6495EE013 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:25:17 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Matthias Andree's message of "Wed, 03 Mar 2004 19:52:13 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56531 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56531 Matthias Andree writes: > Gnus appears to have some difficulties handling RFC-2231, I haven't even > checked if it's supposed to be implemented. It wasn't. But I've now added it to `rfc2047-encoded-word-regexp'. > This is from the Usefor mailing list, a summary line: > > R 20040303T162159 [ 20: Charles Lindsey ] Re: =?us-ascii*la?q?Re:_?= Re: Ha, ha. That's actually quite funny -- specifying Latin for 'Re' to imply that it doesn't mean 'Reply'. (But apart from that joke I think RFC 2231 is pretty useless -- noone cares about the language tag extension to RFC 2047. The main part of the RFC is also silly, there was no sane reason to invent a new way of encoding MIME parameter values when they could just as well have reused the RFC 2047 encoding).