From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36410 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sender header? Date: 25 May 2001 11:26:17 -0400 Sender: prj@multivac.cwru.edu Message-ID: References: <01May23.141128edt.115245@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.115917edt.115250@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.143521edt.115214@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.153439edt.115213@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.163305edt.115259@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.172056edt.115272@gateway.intersys.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171999 8437 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:46:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 16086 invoked by alias); 25 May 2001 15:26:17 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 16081 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 15:26:17 -0000 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (261@129.22.96.25) by gnus.org with SMTP; 25 May 2001 15:26:17 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 28670 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2001 15:26:39 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: "\(ding\)" In-Reply-To: (Stainless Steel Rat's message of "24 May 2001 21:15:45 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36410 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36410 Stainless Steel Rat writes: > * prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) on Thu, 24 May 2001 >| False. If domain.com's mail servers accept mail for domain.com but >| not for random-sending-host.domain.com, then Sender (as you would have >| it) would not be an actual mailbox, even with the DNS records in >| place. > > If domain.com's mail servers do not accept mail for the domain.com domain, > they are so horribly misconfigured that anyone stuck with them should jump > ship for AOL. I agree. But that has nothing to do with what I said. paul