From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35763 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Georg C. F. Greve" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Crypto-MIME in GNUS Date: 12 Apr 2001 12:33:16 +0200 Sender: "Georg C. F. Greve" Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171452 4783 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:37:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 22034 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2001 10:34:22 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 22029 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2001 10:34:21 -0000 Original-Received: from mail-ffm-p.arcor-ip.de (HELO mail.arcor-ip.de) (145.253.2.10) by gnus.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2001 10:34:21 -0000 Original-Received: from fusebox.gnu-hamburg (145.253.176.102) by mail.arcor-ip.de; 12 Apr 2001 12:33:57 +0200 Original-Received: from reason.gnu-hamburg (root@reason.gnu-hamburg [10.129.4.1]) by fusebox.gnu-hamburg (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3CAXvu08499 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:33:57 +0200 Original-Received: (from greve@localhost) by reason.gnu-hamburg (8.11.2/8.11.2/Debian 8.11.2-1) id f3CAXHV02289; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:33:17 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Organisation: GNU Project X-Home-Page: http://www.gnu.org/people/greve.html X-PGP-Affinity: will accept encrypted messages for GNU Privacy Guard X-PGP-Fingerprint: 2D68 D553 70E5 CCF9 75F4 9CC9 6EF8 AFC2 8657 4ACA In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "10 Apr 2001 15:23:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 49 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35763 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35763 --==-=-= Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Simon, || On 10 Apr 2001 15:23:24 +0200 || Simon Josefsson wrote:=20 sj> Well, there are at least two standards here. :-) Aren't there always? :-) sj> FWIW, people I communicate with that uses Outlook and some PGP sj> plugin does not handle PGP/MIME (RFC2015). The plugin perform sj> PGP-operations on each MIME part individually and only insert the sj> PGP output instead of the MIME content of that part. I don't sj> think it even modifies MIME headers. Yuk. Yikes. This doesn't sound very standard-ish. >> Exactly. Which is stupid. Unless the others are also you (which is >> not the standard case, imho), they won't be able to read the mail >> then. So why bother sending it to them at all? sj> I've no idea. :-) I changed it, it should look at Cc and Bcc now. :-))) >> ...does pretty much the same. But only almost. It only encrypts >> the following part, not the whole message. When I encrypt I >> normally want the whole thing encrypted... otherwise you run a >> high chance to insert another part and accidentally lose >> encryption that way. sj> Ah, yes, I agree. Those commands are made to only sign or sj> encrypt the current MML part, but maybe that's not very sj> intuitive. Perhaps they could be changed? I think they should be changed / renamed. The default should be "encrypt everything" when selecting encryption. "Just encrypt this part" should be harder to find / have to be selected specifically. Just my 2 cents... Regards, Georg =2D-=20 Georg C. F. Greve Free Software Foundation Europe (http://fsfeurope.org) Brave GNU World (http://brave-gnu-world.org) --=-=-=-- --==-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard iD8DBQE61YRsbvivwoZXSsoRAoSDAJ40WDR/n/BLfY59d/r3R5yiiJudrgCfZcZD FJ9TBshsHGvncPwMQun28SQ= =v7IM -----END PGP MESSAGE----- --==-=-=--