From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23888
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: some mail annoyances
Date: 06 Jul 1999 05:58:55 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m3wvwe5szk.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
References: <m2k8sx6ph3.fsf@magnus.bothner.com> <m37lohnomf.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <vafhfnks66u.fsf@petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <m31zeneqli.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <vafu2rja1j1.fsf@petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161538 5616 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:52:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:52:18 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA25551
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 00:01:06 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAB10131;
	Mon, 5 Jul 1999 22:57:32 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 05 Jul 1999 22:57:58 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA16043
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 22:56:37 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (bang.netfonds.no [195.1.89.231])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA25326
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 23:55:33 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost)
	by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA07257;
	Tue, 6 Jul 1999 06:07:29 +0200
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Now-Reading: Maureen F. McHugh's _China Mountain Zhang_
X-Now-Playing: Nick Drake's _Tanworth-in-Arden_: "To The Garden"
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "05 Jul 1999 11:28:34 +0200"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070092 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.92) XEmacs/21.2 (Sumida)
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Original-Lines: 18
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23888
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23888

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE writes:

> > > What else is needed?  Turning on total-expire?  Is that sufficient?
> > 
> > Well, don't people who want a Real Mail Reader want to explicitly
> > delete mail?  
> 
> Exactly.  Please note the function which is like
> gnus-summary-mark-unread-as-read except that it ticks articles rather
> than marking them as read.

Yeah, but I meant "delete" as in `B DEL', not as in "mark as read and
then let expiry handle it".  Er.  But when you use total-expire,
there's not much of a difference, is there?  Never mind.  :-)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen