New Digest Handling?

New Digest Handling?

[E. David Bell]

I just switched from 0.69 to 0.83.

Is digest splitting being handled differently now?  I do a
gnus-summary-read-document on a digest and get:

   [Informal Aliyah ] 19-Apr    <* mixed> TACHLIS digest 1734
     [Informal Aliyah ] 19-Apr    <1 text>
     [Informal Aliyah ] 19-Apr    <2.* digest>
       [Yael Meyer      ] 18-Apr    Re: Custom questions
       [Alexis Rosoff   ] 18-Apr    
       [Stuart Goldstein] 18-Apr    Nile Perch
       [jakes@netvision.] 18-Apr    A 'Fishy Tale'-Important
       [Gossels Lenny   ] 18-Apr    RE: bob and irina
       [Gossels Lenny   ] 18-Apr    RE: Nile Perch
       [Geoffrey S. Mend] 18-Apr    Re: bob and irina
                .
                .
                .

The first 3 lines didn't used to show up when I did the
gnus-summary-read-document.  Now when I run to
gnus-summary-sort-by-subject it has no effect.

Any way around this?


-- 
-David
________________________________________________________________
E. David Bell                       |           dave@cavalry.com

Re: New Digest Handling?

[Jack Vinson]

For what it is worth, my digest are still handled normally.  I usually
enter them with C-d (gnus-summary-enter-digest), but
gnus-summary-read-document doesn't seem to make a difference.  It drops me
into a virtual group with all the articles.

Actually, I usually jump into the group, mark all the articles and move
them to another group so that I can read all the digests together as
regular mail.  I don't suppose anyone has come up with mail-processing code
that bursts digests and dumps them into a group completely behind the
scenes?  (I've written a script that I fire on the digest message.  I'd
really like something that works as mail is retrieved.)

Jack

Re: New Digest Handling?

[Tony E. Bennett]

Jack Vinson <jvinson@chevax.ecs.umass.edu> writes:
> 
> Actually, I usually jump into the group, mark all the articles and move
> them to another group so that I can read all the digests together as
> regular mail.  I don't suppose anyone has come up with mail-processing code
> that bursts digests and dumps them into a group completely behind the
> scenes?  (I've written a script that I fire on the digest message.  I'd
> really like something that works as mail is retrieved.)

'formail' does this fairly well.  I run it from procmail on certain lists.

    # burst out the digest
    :0:
    * ^Subject:.*Digest.*pilot
    | formail +1 -ds >> palmpilot

-- 
--tbennett     t.bennett@computer.org

Re: New Digest Handling?

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

davidbe@msil.sps.mot.com (E. David Bell) writes:

> Is digest splitting being handled differently now?  I do a
> gnus-summary-read-document on a digest and get:
> 
>    [Informal Aliyah ] 19-Apr    <* mixed> TACHLIS digest 1734
>      [Informal Aliyah ] 19-Apr    <1 text>

This is how nndoc handles MIME digests.

> Any way around this?

You can specify `nndoc-article-type' as `slack-digest', or something.
Although how you would do that I don't quite know.  :-)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen