From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18149 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.39 is released Date: 25 Oct 1998 17:49:11 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156723 4636 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:32:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA25868 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 12:06:19 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB24495; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 11:06:07 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 25 Oct 1998 11:05:49 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA08509 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 11:05:27 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp098.uio.no [129.240.240.103]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA25836 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 12:05:22 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA25217; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 18:05:16 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Amy Hempel's _Reasons to Live_ X-Now-Playing: Squarepusher's _Music Is Rotted One Note_: "Chunk-S" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "25 Oct 1998 15:24:15 +0100" User-Agent: Gnus/5.07004 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.40) Emacs/20.3 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Huh?! Why? byte-code-function-p is an obsolete function that should > not be used. It is? Under Emacs 20.3 compiled-function-p is the obsolete function that should not be used. :-) You should coordinate this with RMS. (Actually, I think byte-code-function-p makes more sense, in case we later get natively compiled functions, which would then be, like, compiled-function-p'd functions. Or perhaps they would just be subrs?) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen