From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/13953 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: More On Mime Date: 13 Feb 1998 12:19:54 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035153225 12055 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:33:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA05288 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 04:06:08 -0800 Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA07652 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 06:04:49 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAN21278; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 06:40:56 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 13 Feb 1998 06:03:17 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA24632 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 06:02:38 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 15313 invoked by uid 504); 13 Feb 1998 12:02:33 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 15307 invoked from network); 13 Feb 1998 12:02:31 -0000 Original-Received: from xyplex28.uio.no (HELO sparky.gnus.org) (129.240.154.48) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 13 Feb 1998 12:02:30 -0000 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA15390; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 13:06:12 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: SL Baur's message of "11 Feb 1998 13:29:14 -0800" X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.25/XEmacs 19.15 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Yup. I did some timing of this (wrt base64 decoding) in tm when we > were first integrating it with XEmacs. It wasn't so much that large > attachments were slow to decode, but that funneling things through > mmencode was *much* faster. Has there been any discussion on including base64 support in Emacs/XEmacs proper? It seems like a natural thing to do to me... `base64-buffer-region' and `unbase64-buffer-region', or whatever. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen