From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12890
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Odd nnmail-split problem
Date: 23 Nov 1997 07:12:51 +0100
Message-ID: <m3wwi0dtp8.fsf@sparky.gnus.org>
References: <upkk9e4c2cz.fsf@mind.learning.cs.cmu.edu> <6flnykluzf.fsf@bavur.dna.lth.se> <upkiutoc0pe.fsf@mind.learning.cs.cmu.edu> <6fsoss21bs.fsf@half.dna.lth.se> <upkg1osbudi.fsf@mind.learning.cs.cmu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152348 6227 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:19:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:19:08 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA05630
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 01:03:57 -0800
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA22436
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 02:17:17 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23])
	by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with SMTP id IAA22826
	for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 08:10:45 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: (qmail 21328 invoked by uid 504); 23 Nov 1997 07:10:45 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 21325 invoked from network); 23 Nov 1997 07:10:42 -0000
Original-Received: from xyplex16.uio.no (HELO sparky.gnus.org) (129.240.154.36)
  by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 23 Nov 1997 07:10:16 -0000
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost)
	by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA16352;
	Sun, 23 Nov 1997 07:52:06 +0100
Mail-Copies-To: never
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Stefan Waldherr's message of "19 Nov 1997 13:39:53 -0500"
X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.14/XEmacs 19.15
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Original-Xref: sparky.gnus.org queue:39
Original-Lines: 19
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12890
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12890

Stefan Waldherr <swa@cs.cmu.edu> writes:

> Good hint. Although I wasn't able to create a nndoc group, I could create an
> neething group and query there. The mail would have gone to "delete" whichs
> means that
> 
>   ; likely spam
>   ("to" ".+" "delete")
> 
> matched and the mail should be in delete. Well, it isn't. Do I smell a bug
> here?

Could you put the mail back in the spool and edebug-defun through the
oddly named `nnmail-check-duplication' in nnmail.el and see why Gnus
junks it?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen