From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12685 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Quassia Gnus v0.12 is released Date: 25 Oct 1997 00:50:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152177 5133 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:16:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA10867 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 17:16:42 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA19876 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 19:18:18 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.7/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with SMTP id BAA27307 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 01:04:49 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (qmail 16496 invoked by uid 504); 24 Oct 1997 23:04:18 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 16481 invoked from network); 24 Oct 1997 23:04:16 -0000 Original-Received: from xyplex26.uio.no (HELO sparky.gnus.org) (129.240.154.46) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 1997 23:04:14 -0000 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA01126; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 00:56:35 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Matt Simmons's message of "20 Oct 1997 23:20:50 -0500" X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.13/XEmacs 19.15 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > > I don't want to put nnml under control of > > the agent -- that would be a complete waste of time and disk space. > Why not? If nothing else, it would provide consistency. It would be consistent; it just wouldn't be very nice. > I can't be the only one who fetchmails his mail, disconnects, and incs > it while disconnected. I have complete control over mail outside of > nnml: fetchmail gets it, and sendmail takes care of queueing it until > I connect again. I want to be able to tell Gnus that it should inc > mail whenever I hit `gnus-group-get-new-news' and that it should > always pass mail along to sendmail when I'm done with a message. You're probably not the only one, but I don't think this is the usual mode of operations. I'd suggest sticking `nnml-request-scan' in a hook run off of `gnus-group-get-new-news'. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen