From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70286 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Built-in HTML renderer in Emacs? Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:57:26 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87sk1uzjap.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871v9dlgqp.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lj7ljyxd.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874oe9jwv3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vd6pig2y.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87occhfl77.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d3sxfkhc.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878w3lfjgd.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d3sx8gkq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871v9d8dj2.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283371077 18980 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2010 19:57:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:57:57 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18672@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Sep 01 21:57:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqtRS-0005Yx-7t for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:57:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OqtRI-0002Li-NC; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:57:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OqtRH-0002LO-Cx for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:57:43 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OqtRD-0008Jt-4f for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:57:43 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OqtRC-0001hT-00 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:57:38 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqtR8-0005NN-1y for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:57:34 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:57:34 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:57:34 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEWIYGFdNDm2ranh49uo hYIQBgeffCkgAAACUElEQVQ4jU2SzXbjIAyFhUP2qIn3LtB9Cu6eEHlft8P7v8pc4Z8ZzvEx8HF1 kQT5kCRk76fWR3hEqcOUPHkvwUuaxg38PPxQpyklwv7jSelj22/rI0n1qhhCCkOuyw6aR9iQA0Il c5nL7QQhYwDR9KyzsXn8B9KQc4o01fk55HSCt5BjBKVQjIH2BH8Ix6ZXJs+DBr3qjZhbu6RJcoZH 7m5JgRMDgMX8giJvQ4EVM7ZXX1qhnA6wSjxB9hRi1cl7a99SeM8DgxLujMXc1tWadeR8gHcPnc+p MVlnePNMPpAvNiAnPzqpjviStFSqqEg0ItRivVjh26aAOdmQovX500ZPZbyhaSIT4bqR4CD1YUWI xpdFO1RCqNc0aOEcADPipxQlEqlVkDmkQmI4pipz9EiatjtoP2F9n7M/8tgnyV+kmMtnOBPc/0m+ ZzGJ306wRcIV213suJ6EtCA+isi10bUx8+tQ+FiIALTtbxNI3c0jsUNyol1ckQnzPXRQ2BVRkId5 dOSUgVAko4FEwvyLJYBhdqGDopHk9XnDayIDkcHLoWLJ6H69fIU8G5VA4wLp6KEuHzk/ABDaOK47 gP0Ae+lLILb4WSvqosW5U1EXJh476O5PVObuNqCvAkC6yQKLu0MInD9AT3B55S+9Uges4E6ioZZb Xoj/B872BJefPOIQgNGC6USoK9bcCh1gi9kV1za14nZg+sR1cm1j2zzMum6hDtCaznF+bQp465Ms HbCC/um8F/F5Kpwt2GTUyx6gjNpAVycFa09+V4x6Eq/Y8F9KELP1uqDPowAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Prince's _Controversy_: "Ronnie Talk To Russia" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SUSSJ7qnNyb80GN8P7WrvJHGeco= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70286 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > Katsumi Yamaoka and I had a similar discussion about safe URLs. I think > fighting spammers by filtering all images is a losing battle and > everyone will just set that to nil, but maybe the filter can at least > take the image size into account. I don't think spammers are the main problem -- it's a question of loss of privacy. There are people selling tools that lets you know whether somebody has read the email you sent them just by exploiting the sloppiness of mail readers in this area. I don't think that's a good idea to have enable by default. > 1x1 images are suspicious but a 800x600 image is probably safe. > Basically the pixel count should be over 8 and each dimension should > be over 2. You don't know the size of the image before you download it. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen