Re: Gnus interface to Bugzilla?

[Nelson Ferreira <nelson.ferreira@ieee.org>]

"Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

    Lars> Steve Youngs <steve@sxemacs.org> writes:
    >> No, that'd suck.  Each bug should be a thread within the group that is
    >> the "product".  We have 2 "products" in our Bugzilla, so you'd have
    >> something like...

    Lars> Hm...  the problem then would be things like "I want to see all the
    Lars> messages in bug #542, but not any others in the same product
    Lars> category".  With the one-group-per-bug approach, that would be `C-u
    Lars> RET', while with the one-group-per-product, it would require a
    Lars> separate special command.  And if you're not interested in a bug, you
    Lars> just kill the group.  Etc.

Why not 'overload' the concept of digest, i.e. treat the bug as a
digest and C-d would give you the replies there? If message-ids are
generated the read messages should still be marked as such right ?

    Lars> Of course, it helps if you use topics and all the new bugzilla groups
    Lars> end up there automatically.

I am not too fond of having groups created automatically, even with topics.


[...]


-- 
Nelson Ferreira