From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49038 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Getting started with spam filtering Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 07:50:29 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <84u1gkfa84.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <4n65szll2k.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nr8bmb8bd.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <87znq9vrfb.fsf@emacswiki.org> <87vg0xvc1c.fsf@emacswiki.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1042203017 25908 80.91.224.249 (10 Jan 2003 12:50:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Wyby-0006iw-00 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:50:10 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18WycK-0007XD-00; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 06:50:32 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 10 Jan 2003 06:51:26 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA21812 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 06:51:14 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 41134 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2003 12:50:15 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 41129 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2003 12:50:15 -0000 Original-Received: from ns1.beld.net (208.229.215.81) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 10 Jan 2003 12:50:15 -0000 Original-Received: from heechee.beld.net (dhcp-0-30-bd-1-93-b2.cpe.beld.net [24.233.65.6]) by ns1.beld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513343B859; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 07:47:53 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Niklas Morberg X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Niklas Morberg , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Niklas Morberg's message of "Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:01:39 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090011 (Oort Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49038 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49038 On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, niklas.morberg@axis.com wrote: > Nothing weird to report, but I am a bit confused regarding > the group parameters for a ham group: > > 1. I set the spam-contents parameter to > `gnus-group-spam-classification-ham' > > The parameter documentation says: > > On summary exit, the specified ham processors will be invoked on > ham-marked messages. Exercise caution, since the ham processor > will see the same message more than once because there is no ham > message registry. > > 2. I set spam-process to > `gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-stat'. > > The thing I don't understand is why I have to do both? > Wouldn't it be enough to only do (2)? A ham group does more than just invoke ham processors - you could have a ham group just because you want to use the spam-process-destination parameter, and perhaps future functionality. > What happens if I only do (1) and not (2)? Nothing harmful. You are saying "I have a group with articles that are positively not spam. I don't want them processed, though." The manual has, I think, a good explanation of all the things that apply for a ham group - if it doesn't, let me know so I can improve it. Ted