From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38859 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Haberzettl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Posting to unknown group? Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:28:03 +0200 Organization: private site Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174657 24779 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:30:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 20469 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2001 16:28:09 -0000 Original-Received: from pd9e61653.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO khaberz.de) (postfix@217.230.22.83) by gnus.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2001 16:28:09 -0000 Original-Received: by khaberz.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386), from userid 500) id 25FB330D85; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:28:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:02:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.5 (artichoke) Original-Lines: 21 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38859 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38859 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes: > Leafnode looks to see which groups you are reading to decide which > groups to fetch from the upstream server. If you circumvent NNTP, > Leafnode cannot look. So that's why it is better to use NNTP with > Leafnode. > > I think you know better than me whether this reasoning applies to INN, > too (or your config for INN). Well. The problem disappeared with reading from NNTP. Thanks. It' just weird that it used to work like this. Oh well. > However, if it makes your life a bit easier to talk NNTP to your local > INN, why not do that.=20=20 The main reason I set it up like that is that the manual says that reading from the spool is usually faster. Thanks again, Kai