From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22398 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stainless Steel Rat Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: More POP madness Date: 11 Apr 1999 22:03:27 -0400 Organization: The Happy Fun Ball Brigade Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160325 29125 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:32:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA00398 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 1999 22:06:33 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAB24731; Sun, 11 Apr 1999 21:02:25 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 11 Apr 1999 21:02:57 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA14936 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 1999 21:02:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from peorth.gweep.net (ratinox@adhara.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.116.158]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA00270 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 1999 22:02:39 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from ratinox@localhost) by peorth.gweep.net (8.8.7/8.8.8) id WAA00975; Sun, 11 Apr 1999 22:03:27 -0400 Original-To: "(ding)" X-Attribution: Rat In-Reply-To: Dan Christensen's message of "Sun, 11 Apr 1999 17:14:13 -0400" Original-Lines: 28 User-Agent: Gnus/5.07008 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.80) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22398 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22398 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * Dan Christensen on Sun, 11 Apr 1999 | 1) Is this behaviour "correct" or "broken"? It is broken only if a) that information exists on the server, and b) it is destructively removed -- that is, it is utterly impossible to regenerate that information. | 2) What should the retrieving program (fetchmail, pop3-movemail, etc) | do when this happens? 'Be liberal in what they accept'. Ie, deal with the situation as best they can. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v0.9.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE3EVRugl+vIlSVSNkRAiqsAJ9o+vVrtM1qp24YoEsG2QtxNgBhtgCfcuw0 jVZd1anISK9BIElUUH3C6eM= =PkWv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Rat \ When not in use, Happy Fun Ball should be Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ returned to its special container and PGP Key: at a key server near you! \ kept under refrigeration.