From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75308 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Fancy Mail Splitting documentation needs improved? Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:16:57 +0100 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292865576 1321 80.91.229.12 (20 Dec 2010 17:19:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:19:36 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23660@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Dec 20 18:19:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PUjOW-0007y4-5C for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:19:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PUjOS-0000q5-FC; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:19:28 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PUjOR-0000ps-4b for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:19:27 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PUjOM-0005fi-3L for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:19:26 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PUjOL-00059U-CP for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:19:21 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PUjOK-0007uG-B1 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:19:20 +0100 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:19:20 +0100 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:19:20 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEWbABCZABGYABCcABKJ Q0yZABDn07PfAAACOklEQVQ4jU1TUa7jIAx0QRyAcgHi1v9Qq/+rvByATZX7X2XHJulb9IT6mMzY MwZiGZF2iRRVotqi4juAQLUSkYbPBMj3h20jEcU2TybQbWuRBrV2Au3LiBqpUoza2gTwy1SUYmIe +Hf4t42rMwahgZ1Fr9UoOYB+AoOx/Wy27GgCcCEG0Jei+FkMeB8A6Au0FqdUhNRe/wMSrBsDngeU 2tTASmiwdJiGbR6WlboIGFOqgRMgOK15u6XNGnTs2CN9Dje4nwYRmi+EmAaCsSOX+gLhuYrlRFe7 iBx/LZjxSvqKdEUCeaznc9vWVfXtDSr5UIGEFYTn81HeND2BEY3x9Ay3H33blDFBdkAIh8ZZ8/sY N80ZBsmuBG3nAgPWiwM2ETkZWycY7LlAhOCMq5VmY6DHmAFYuwBoO6tr2lP2Gm67HidjNXrxGjaP JDIJ65+ISPMFEO3jhlOANd+Zl1+pMGaRNTvQAYjNNh1j3E1qMWDJ5cuwBeSBPl/MGYuWw0u0QJr+ Rmhk5rsBlhVuqV1VHxG0phTuWrCLiPIJ591rnAwbIHKJ8wrqiN2fGr7E3aImMTnQq71By2qQBFDO p6l9ydjs+UmqYRwHlO24IPKTcdCO686f16J21Dn3km3mQlKFK93u/m2n3BUAvq1jRzJLR3g4sXbV ffCBuCotJaIIvAmq4RlMRtql4lu0VPJlkCWGUK3dN+vroX3PF2MErgyxuw0IXZ0MkQo1CmJZWRie ugFI1h6ndHNoDTnjH+/2lpbub30JAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: King Crimson's _Discipline_: "Matte Kudasai" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:q3acaB5oOkD60ZIV7wT1TjzeHKw= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75308 Archived-At: Tommy Kelly writes: > I'm *really* struggling to understand "6.4.6 Fancy Mail > Splitting". Yes, it's written kinda computer sciencey. That is, incomprehensible. > ##### START OF POSSIBLE RE-WRITE Could you send a patch? And do you have FSF copyright assignment papers on file? > | - this says we will treat all of the remaining items in the list as > splits but that we'll process them in order, and that we'll stop > whenever we get a match. Yes... it's the traditional `or' operator. > OK, I'm stopping here for comments from y'all. Note that I'm thinking > aloud in the above. For example, the idea that there are four > forms of split could probably be simplified into a single syntax > covering all forms. But I haven't figure out what that looks like yet. > > Comments *very* welcome. Looks good to me. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen