Re: To/Cc address uniquification

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> You could start with message-hierarchical-addresses and make it more
> general.

In that particular case, yes...  but not in the bugzilla case.  I
think. 

> LMI> And there's the \1 literal string expansion thing again that we were
> LMI> talking about earlier.
>
> Yeah, that's the piece I'd love to see generically available.

I'd actually coded the thing (missing just a few bits), and then I
though "well, why not just use `replace-match'", so I did that instead.

It fails if you're using things like "\\." in the replacement case, so
perhaps I should just finish the implementation.  On the other hand,
perhaps `replace-match' should just be more sensible...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen