From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/68113 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bjorn Solberg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: IMAP and Exchange 2007 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:15:18 -0800 Message-ID: References: <764p0ar5a9.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <87wsd5cz2k.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231514142 9729 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2009 15:15:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Jake Colman Original-X-From: ding-owner+M16558@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Jan 09 16:16:53 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LLJ6K-0002uS-Sg for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:16:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LLJ44-0004kL-V5; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:14:25 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LL52e-000181-DE for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:16:00 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LL52b-0006x2-S7 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:16:00 -0600 Original-Received: from ti0187a340-dhcp0065.bb.online.no ([88.90.247.66] helo=home.famsolberg.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1LL52s-0006WE-00 for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:16:14 +0100 Original-Received: from home.famsolberg.com (maui53 [127.0.0.1]) by home.famsolberg.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n090FQad009107; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:15:26 -0800 Original-Received: (from bhso@localhost) by home.famsolberg.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n090FP02009106; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:15:25 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87wsd5cz2k.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (Reiner Steib's message of "Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:39:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.2.5 2008-06-10) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-270--2081h-0s--0d--gcc, 0.000-257--1983h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-256--1974h-0s--0d--CVS, 0.000-179--1376h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-176--1358h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus Spam tokens: 0.976-590--90h-2652s--0d--H*RT:sk:postmas, 0.976-590--90h-2652s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:sk:postmas, 0.975-587--95h-2662s--0d--HX-Envelope-From:sk:postmas, 0.931-477--327h-3137s--0d--ssl Autolearn status: no -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.8 MIME_BASE64_TEXT RAW: Message text disguised using base64 encoding 0.9 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [88.90.247.66 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.9 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL [88.90.247.66 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:68113 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reiner Steib writes: > On Thu, Jan 08 2009, Jake Colman wrote: [...] >> I have not checked whether 'imap-enable-exchange-bug-workaround' is >> still required. > It should be auto-detected on a per-server basis now. But if you only > use IMAP against Exchange 2007 it won't hurt to set it globally. I am using Gnus off of CVS fresh as of this morning.=20 I actually had to set the variable explicitly for it to work with Exchange 2007. My mailbox was migrated from 2003 to 2007 yesterday, and the different uidvalidity values seemed to cause some trouble that I was able to work around by killing the problematic groups, do "delete bogus groups" and re-subscribe them. Now however I'm seeing a different problem: When replying to messages and Gcc: to the group/folder I'm replying in, the message gets sent but I get the following backtrace: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument numberp "*:*") signal(wrong-type-argument (numberp "*:*")) byte-code("=C2=84)=00=C3=86=C3=87 =C2=89=1AA@)\"=C2=83)=00r=0B=C2=86=16= =00pq --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 yMAhyRA= --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by home.famsolberg.com id n090FQad009107 =CA\fA=0D=0E\f=0E=0D$) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 2KsJQAk= --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A\"=C2=87" [imap-enable-exchange-bug-workaround data x buffer uids props st= ring-match "The specified message set is invalid" make-local-variable t ima= p-fetch signal receive nouidfetch] 6) imap-fetch-safe(("*" "*:*") "UID") imap-message-appenduid-1("misc") imap-message-append("misc" # nil nil " *nnimap* mail.shopz= illainc.com") nnimap-request-accept-article("misc" "mail.shopzillainc.com" t) gnus-request-accept-article("misc" (nnimap "mail.shopzillainc.com" (nnima= p-address "mail.shopzillainc.com") (nnimap-stream ssl)) t t) gnus-inews-do-gcc() run-hooks(message-sent-hook) message-send(nil) message-send-and-exit(nil) call-interactively(message-send-and-exit) The *imap-log* buffer shows [...] 68878 OK APPEND completed. 68879 EXAMINE "misc" * 154 EXISTS * 1 RECENT * FLAGS (\Seen \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft $MDNSent) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] Permanent flags * OK [UNSEEN 125] Is the first unseen message * OK [UIDVALIDITY 156] UIDVALIDITY value * OK [UIDNEXT 3039] The next unique identifier value 68879 OK [READ-ONLY] EXAMINE completed. 68880 NOOP 68880 OK NOOP completed. 68881 SELECT "info" * 37 EXISTS * 37 RECENT * FLAGS (\Seen \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft $MDNSent) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Seen \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft $MDNSent)] P= ermanent flags * OK [UNSEEN 36] Is the first unseen message * OK [UIDVALIDITY 148] UIDVALIDITY value * OK [UIDNEXT 38] The next unique identifier value 68881 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed. 68882 STATUS "info" (UNSEEN) * STATUS info (UNSEEN 2)=20 68882 OK STATUS completed. 68883 EXPUNGE 68883 OK EXPUNGE completed. I suppose the backtrace happens when it stores the Gcc: copy. The copy makes it into the group just fine, and the email gets sent to all the recipients. If I send without Gcc:, I don't get the backtrace. Any pointers would be welcome. Thanks, Bjorn. --=-=-=--