From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55839 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Bug? Are multibyte marks (e.g. gnus-unseen-mark) allowed? Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 18:47:49 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1073584632 17355 80.91.224.253 (8 Jan 2004 17:57:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M4379@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Jan 08 18:57:10 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AeeP7-0008NF-00 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 18:57:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AeeOp-0006HY-00; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:56:51 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AeeOh-0006HS-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:56:43 -0600 Original-Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DC13A0034 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:56:41 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from [195.249.130.83] (0xc3f98253.esnxr3.ras.tele.dk [195.249.130.83]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D62C5EE1F2 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:56:37 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Wed, 07 Jan 2004 22:09:13 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55839 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55839 Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes: > I've changed `gnus-unseen-mark' to some Latin-1 char and found that > `o' (gnus-summary-save-article) no longer works. > > _If_ `gnus-*-mark' must not be multibyte, we should document it. I think multibyte should be allowed. But my naive fix (delete-char, insert-char instead of subst-char-in-region) had some unintended side effects.