From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55402 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Cache passwords Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 00:59:19 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87vfoa5she.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1072828979 30715 80.91.224.253 (31 Dec 2003 00:02:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 00:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3942@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Dec 31 01:02:57 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AbTpB-0007hg-00 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:02:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AbTp5-00019V-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:02:51 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AbTp1-00019Q-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:02:47 -0600 Original-Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283463A0038 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:02:46 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from [195.249.130.38] (0xc3f98226.esnxr3.ras.tele.dk [195.249.130.38]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C19F5EE1BF for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:02:41 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:26:51 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1004 (Gnus v5.10.4) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55402 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55402 Simon Josefsson writes: > Jesper Harder writes: > >> Is there a particular reason for using an obarray rather than a hash >> table? > > I dunno. Does Emacs 20 support hash tables? Probably not. But I thought we were dropping support for Emacs 20 in No Gnus.