From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53392 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthias Andree Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: [patch] (gnus)Splitting in IMAP Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:03:10 +0200 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1057917776 25634 80.91.224.249 (11 Jul 2003 10:02:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 10:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M1936@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Jul 11 12:02:54 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19aujt-0006f6-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:02:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19aukJ-0003EO-00; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 05:03:19 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19aukC-0003EI-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 05:03:12 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 51889 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2003 10:03:12 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 51884 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2003 10:03:11 -0000 Original-Received: from pd9e1e1bb.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO m2a2.dyndns.org) (postfix@217.225.225.187) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2003 10:03:11 -0000 Original-Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2F5E78B26E; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:03:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53392 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53392 Hi, I don't know the canonical way to send this, so here is some fodder for the Gnus CVS committers, fixing grammar's off "Splitting in IMAP" Section with gnus.texi. >:-) I presume these have been accidentally omitted when reformulating. I didn't read the whole section, just fixed the obvious ones. I wonder if Sieve (not mentioned) qualifies as non-standard though ;-) Index: texi/gnus.texi =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/texi/gnus.texi,v retrieving revision 6.534 diff -u -r6.534 gnus.texi --- texi/gnus.texi 24 Jun 2003 08:12:31 -0000 6.534 +++ texi/gnus.texi 11 Jul 2003 10:12:46 -0000 @@ -16072,11 +16072,11 @@ @subsection Splitting in IMAP @cindex splitting imap mail -Splitting is something Gnus users has loved and used for years, and now +Splitting is something Gnus users have loved and used for years, and now the rest of the world is catching up. Yeah, dream on, not many -@acronym{IMAP} server has server side splitting and those that have splitting -seem to use some non-standard protocol. This means that @acronym{IMAP} -support for Gnus has to do its own splitting. +@acronym{IMAP} servers have server side splitting and those that have +splitting seem to use some non-standard protocol. This means that +@acronym{IMAP} support for Gnus has to do its own splitting. And it does. -- Matthias Andree